Strategic
communication is uniquely situated to foster these development goals and help
overcome some of the above challenges because it facilitates both individual
level and societal level changes. It consists of three key approaches advocacy, social mobilisation, and programme communication also referred to as behaviour change communication.
Strategic
Communication: is an evidence-based,
results-oriented process, undertaken in consultation with the participant
group(s). It linked to other programme
elements, considering the local context,
and using of multiplicity of communication approaches, to
stimulate positive and measurable behaviour and social change.
Advocacy
Advocacy:
Influencing Heart and Minds of Decision Makers Successful advocacy strategies
aim to influence decision makers at various levels; at international, regional,
national or district levels. Therefore, the advocacy component of the strategy
should inform and motivate appropriate leaders to create a supportive
environment for the programme by taking actions such as: changing policies,
allocating resources, speaking out on critical issues, and initiating public
discussion.
Possible
results of an advocacy intervention can be targeted leaders taking actions such
as:
■
Legal reform, or enactment of new law(s), or rules of business;
■ Policy decisions, formulation of and/or
reform;
■
Administrative directives, rules; and
■
Resource mobilization, financial allocation. In addition, the advocacy
component can build the capacity of leaders to become advocates themselves and
speak out on issues pertinent to the programme to:
■
Strengthen political will and remove blockages;
■
Change funding priorities;
■
Support policy change; and
■ Address social barriers.
Social Mobilization
Social mobilization is a process of harnessing
selected partners to raise demand for or sustain progress toward a development
objective. Social mobilization enlists the participation
of institutions, community networks and social and religious groups to use
their membership and other resources to strengthen participation in activities
at the grass-roots level.
Examples of
groups that may get involved in social mobilization include school teachers and
students, religious groups, farmers' cooperatives, micro-credit groups, civil
society organizations, professional associations, women's groups and youth
associations. Well-planned social mobilisation efforts also seek to empower
communities to take control of their own situations, including accepting or
rejecting interventions. Social
mobilisation, integrated with other communication approaches, has been a key
feature in numerous communication efforts worldwide.
Whether formal
or non-formal, organizations selected for social mobilization should be chosen
according to the following criteria:
■ Generally the
group has a wide geographic spread over the country with a structure emanating
from the national level down to lower levels of administration-to districts and
below. Its participation in a cause can be triggered and activated at the
national level.
■ The group is
already known and accepted by the community targeted in the communication
strategy.
Core elements of
successful social mobilisation efforts and illustrates two experiences from the
South Asia region – Nepal and Bangladesh - in order to further the
understanding of effective planning of social mobilisation as an integral part
of strategic communication processes. Some
prominent examples include: (a) Soul City’s campaign against domestic violence
in South Africa, (b) the UNICEF polio eradication campaign in Uttar Pradesh.
Communication
material to support the work of social mobilizers includes something to
identify their role in the campaign (caps, T-shirts, bags) as well as some
simple informational materials such as brochures or flash cards to help with
message delivery.
Behaviour Change Communication
Behaviour change
communication involves face-to-face dialogue with individuals or groups to
inform, motivate, problem-solve or plan, with the objective to promote
behaviour change. Modern technology has recently enhanced the scope and reach
of behaviour development communication such as radio and television 'talk
shows' with phone-ins allowing for dialogue on a wider scale. The backbone of
developing the behaviour change communication component of the strategy comes
from a combination of data, participant and behavioural analyses and community
input.
■ Which
communication objectives need individualized information and problem-solving to
be achieved (e.g. persuading caregivers of the importance of fully vaccinating
their children)
■ Who are the
most appropriate participants to conduct inter-personal communication (e.g.
service providers, peer educators, NGO and government frontline workers, health
workers, community leaders)
■ How will
chosen communicators use inter-personal communication-(e.g. through programme
activities, community meetings, house to house visits, during health clinic
visits)
■ What is the
capacity to undertake inter-personal communication (e.g. preparation could
include sharing technical knowledge, communication skills training and
encouraging the development of an appropriateoward the participant group being
contacted)
■ How can the
inter-personal communication activities of front line workers or volunteers be
sustained? (e.g. what resources and activities are necessary for their
continued motivation and support)
■ Have appropriate messages and materials been
developed (e.g. messages which have been developed using community
participation, problem solving, and dialogue)
0 comments:
Post a Comment