FOCUS GROUPS

A focus group discussion (FGD) is a good way to gather together people from similar backgrounds or experiences to discuss a specific topic of interest. The group of participants is guided by a moderator (or group facilitator) who introduces topics for discussion and helps the group to participate in a lively and natural discussion amongst themselves.

The focus group, or group interviewing, is a research strategy for understanding people's attitudes and behavior. From 6 to 12 people are interviewed simultaneously. 

 A mod­erator leading the respondents in a relatively unstructured discussion about the topic un­der investigation. 

The focus group technique has four defining characteristics  

  Focus groups involve people.

The people possess certain characteris­tics and are recruited to share a quality or characteristic of interest to the re­searcher. 

   Focus groups usually provide qualita­tive data. Data from focus groups are used to enhance understanding and to reveal a wide range of opinions, some of which the researcher might not expect

In most cases, they are not used to test hypotheses or to generalize to a popu­lation. 

As the name implies, focus groups have a focused discussion. Most of the ques­tions to be asked are predetermined, the sequence of questions is established, and the questions are structured to further the goal of the research. 

The strength of FGD relies on allowing the participants to agree or disagree with each other so that it provides an insight into how a group thinks about an issues.

FGD sessions need to be prepared carefully through identifying the main objective(s) of the meeting, developing key questions, developing an agenda, and planning how to record the session. The next step is to identify and invite suitable discussion participants; the ideal number is between six and eight. 

FGDs can be also done online. This is particularly useful for overcoming the barrier of distance. While discussion is constrained, the written format can help with reporting on the discussion. 

A

Read More

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD of RESEARCH!

A  scientific research be­gins with a single carefully observed event and  progresses ultimately to the formulation of theories and laws.

 

A theory is a set of re­lated propositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relation­ships among concepts. 

Researchers develop theories by searching for patterns of unifor­mity to explain their data. When relation­ships among variables are invariant under given conditions, researchers may formulate a law. 

A law is a statement of fact meant to explain, in concise terms, an action or set of actions that is generally accepted to be true and universal. 

Both theories and laws help re­searchers search for and explain consistency in behavior, situations, and phenomena.

Five basic characteristics, or tenets(code of belief), distin­guish the scientific method from other meth­ods of knowing.

1. Scientific research is public. Advances in science require freely available informa­tion. Researchers  cannot plead private knowledge, methods, or data in arguing for the accuracy of their findings; scientific research infor­mation must be freely communicated from one researcher to another. Researchers therefore must take great care in their published reports to include in­formation on sampling methods, measure­ments, and data-gathering procedures. This process of replication allows for correction and verification of previous research findings.

 2. Science is objective. Science tries to rule out eccentricities (weirdness) of judgment by researchers. When a study is conducted, explicit rules and procedures are developed and the researcher is bound to follow them.

Objectivity also requires that scientific research deal with facts rather than inter­pretations of facts.

3. Science is empirical. Researchers are con­cerned with a world that is knowable and po­tentially measurable. (Empiricism comes from the Greek word for "experience.") .  Researchers must be able to perceive and classify what they study and reject. Scientists must link abstract concepts to the empirical world through observations, which may be made either directly or indirectly via various measurement instruments.

 Typically, this linkage is accomplished by framing an operational definition.

• Operational definitions are important in science, and a brief introduction requires some backtracking. There are two basic kinds of definitions.

• A constitutive definition defines a word by substituting other words or concepts for it..

• In contrast, an operational definition specifies procedures that allow one to experience or measure a concept.

                                                              

4. Science is systematic and cumulative. No single research study stands alone, nor does it rise or fall by itself. A  smart research­ers always use previous studies as building blocks for their own work. One of the first steps in conducting research is to review the available scientific literature on the topic so that the current study will draw on the heri­tage of past research. This review is valuable.

5. Science is predictive. Science is con­cerned with relating the present to the fu­ture. In fact, scientists strive to develop theories because, among other reasons, they are useful in predicting behavior. 

A theory's adequacy lies in its ability to predict a phe­nomenon or event successfully. 

A theory that offers predictions that are not borne out by data analysis must be carefully reexamined and perhaps discarded. 

Conversely, a theory that generates predictions that are supported by the data can be used to make predictions in other situations.

Read More